crust-api-testing

crust-api-testing teaches an agent to reach for the lightest tool that fits, and to know which checks a spec can derive and which a human still has to write.

The three layers

Layer	File	Best for
test-pipes	.pipes — one pipeline per line	readable CRUD suites, chaining, SQL cross-checks
test-fixture	.crust.ts — TS fixture modules	complex setup, matcher functions, stress runs
gen-fixtures	generated from openapi.json	negative matrices and CRUD flows for every documented operation

The skill’s advice is to start at the top and only descend when the layer above genuinely can’t express the check.

Layer 1 — .pipes suites

One shorthand pipeline per line, # comments, lines run sequentially per file. capture chains requests and sql verifies the database inline:

{"name": "Court", "floors": 3} | POST $BASE/api/buildings -H "authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" | assert (r => r.status === 201) | (r => r.json()) | capture BID (b => b.building.id)
GET $BASE/api/buildings/$BID -H "authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" | expect 200
sql "SELECT count(*)::int AS c FROM buildings WHERE name = 'Court'" | assert (r => r.c === 1)
DELETE $BASE/api/buildings/$BID -H "authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" | expect 204
GET $BASE/api/buildings/$BID -H "authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" | expect 404

That is a complete create → read → verify-in-DB → delete → confirm-gone suite in five lines.

Run it, with a JUnit report for CI:

test-pipes 'tests/**/*.pipes' -b -o report.xml

Things the skill makes explicit:

• Setup module — -s mod.ts, else a sibling <name>.setup.ts. Its default export is awaited before the file and seeds process.env ($BASE, $TOKEN). sql needs $DATABASE_URL.
• SQL row types — rows arrive as the driver returns them. count(*) and numeric may come back as strings or bigints, so cast in SQL (count(*)::int AS c) and compare ids as strings.
• Hermetic per file — process.env is snapshotted and restored around each file, so captures never leak between files.
• Status-check placement — expect N when the check ends the line, assert (r => r.status === N) when more stages follow, because expect only throws at drain.
• Exit codes — 0 all pass, 1 any failure, 2 no files or bad args.

Layer 2 — .crust.ts fixtures

One fixture is one request. setup() returns a context; input fields that are 1-argument functions receive it; output fields that take 1+ arguments are matchers (actual, ctx), and async matchers are awaited.

export default {
  name: "creates a user",
  setup: async () => ({ token: await login() }),
  input: {
    url: "http://localhost:3000/api/users",
    method: "POST",
    headers: (ctx) => ({ authorization: `Bearer ${ctx.token}` }),
    body: { name: "x" },
  },
  output: {
    status: 201,
    data: async (d, ctx) => (await db.userById(d.id)) !== null,
  },
};

test-fixture 'tests/*.crust.ts' -j8 -o report.xml

output.schema takes an inline JSON Schema the response body must conform to, failing with per-field pointer paths. Inline means $ref-free — a $ref anywhere in it is a loud error, because the runner has no spec to resolve it against and would otherwise pass silently. Unknown schema keywords pass: the validator never invents a violation.

Two constraints worth knowing before writing fixtures:

• Fixtures may run concurrently under -j, so share state only through a module-scope promise-cached factory.
• Fixture files may import only relative modules and Bun builtins — the compiled binary cannot resolve npm at runtime. Use Bun.SQL, Bun.file, Bun.jwt.

Layer 3 — gen-fixtures

gen-fixtures ./openapi.json

Output is deterministic and byte-stable — check it in, regenerate, review the git diff. It emits:

• A negative matrix per operation — 401 no-credentials, 403 authenticated-outsider on scope-gated paths, 404 unknown-id, and a 400 matrix per body field: missing required, wrong type, bad enum, too short or long, below or above numeric bounds, pattern violations, unexpected extra property.
• CRUD flows — create → read → update → delete → read-after-delete-404, chained with capture and run by test-pipes with no extra flags.

The honest limit, which the skill states plainly: SQL assertions are not derivable from a spec. Add those by hand in your own .pipes. And the --out directory is deleted and recreated every run, so never hand-edit generated files.

The workflow it recommends

1. gen-fixtures against the spec, run the matrix and flows, fix what fails.
2. Hand-write .pipes for business flows a spec can’t express — SQL checks, multi-resource invariants.
3. Reach for .crust.ts only when a case needs real code: crypto, files, custom matchers.

Related

• API smoke tests · Generated negative fixtures